Morphological Convergence Between an Allopolyploid and One of its Parental Species Correlates with Biased Gene Expression and DNA Loss.

The contribution of gene expression modulation to phenotypic evolution is of major importance to an understanding of the origin of divergent or convergent phenotypes during and following polyploid speciation. Here, we analyzed genome-wide gene expression in 2 subspecies of the allotetraploid species, Senecio mohavensis A. Gray, and its diploid parents S. flavus (Decne.) Sch. Bip. and S. glaucus L. The tetraploid is morphologically much more similar to S. flavus, leading to earlier confusion over its taxonomic status. By means of an analysis of transcriptomes of all 3 species, we show that gene expression divergence between the parent species is relatively low (ca. 14% of loci), whereas there is significant unequal expression between ca. 20-25% of the parental homoeologues (gene copies) in the tetraploid. The majority of the expression bias in the tetraploid is in favor of S. flavus homoeologues (ca. 65% of the differentially expressed loci), and overall expression of this parental species subgenome is higher than that of the S. glaucus subgenome. To determine whether absence of expression of a particular S. glaucus homoeologue in the allotetraploid could be due to loss of DNA, we carried out a PCR-based assay and confirmed that in 3 out of 10 loci the S. glaucus homoeologue appeared absent. Our results suggest that biased gene expression is one cause of the allotetraploid S. mohavensis being more similar in morphology to one of its parent, S. flavus, and that such bias could result, in part, from loss of S. glaucus homoeologues at some loci in the allotetraploid.